This page collects every fuel-economy figure the EPA publishes for the 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD. Below you will find the headline combined, city, and highway MPG, the estimated annual fuel cost at three different driving levels, the tailpipe CO₂ emissions, and a full breakdown of the engine and drivetrain. If you want to know whether this generation got more or less efficient over the years, the year-over-year table further down covers every model year the EPA has rated.

Key takeaways

  • The most efficient car in the Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD class for the 2003 model year is the Toyota RAV4 EV at 78 MPG.
  • The Honda CR-V 2WD has gained 8 MPG since its first rated model year, the 1998 Honda CR-V 2WD at 21 MPG.
  • EPA estimates this car costs around $2,750 more in fuel over five years than an average new vehicle of the same model year.

Fuel economy at a glance

These are the EPA's official ratings for the 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD. The numbers come from a standardised laboratory test cycle and are the same figures that appear on the window sticker of every new car. Real-world mileage varies with driving style, weather, fuel quality, and how heavily loaded the car is.

Combined MPG is a 55/45 weighted blend of the city and highway test cycles. The EPA uses it as the single number you can compare across the entire dataset, including hybrids and EVs (which use the equivalent MPGe figure).

Combined MPG 22 MPG
City MPG 20 MPG
Highway MPG 26 MPG
Annual fuel cost $2,700
Tailpipe CO₂ 404 g/mi
Fuel type Regular

How the 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD compares

The 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD returns 22 combined MPG. Cars in the Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD class for the same model year average 18.5 MPG, which puts this car ahead of the class average by about 19%.

The most efficient car in the Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD class for the 2003 model year is the Toyota RAV4 EV at 78 MPG. The bar chart below puts the Honda CR-V 2WD alongside the class best and the class average so you can see the full picture.

For broader context, the average new car of the 2003 model year (across all classes) returns 18.4 MPG. Larger vehicles pull the all-cars average down, so do not use that figure on its own to judge a small car or a hybrid. The full list of the most efficient cars of the 2003 model year is on its own page.

2003 Honda CR-V 2WD
22 MPG
Class average, 2003
18.5 MPG
Class best, 2003
78 MPG
Average new car, 2003
18.4 MPG

Annual fuel cost across driving patterns

The headline annual fuel cost the EPA publishes assumes 15,000 miles of driving per year and a fuel mix of 55% city and 45% highway. The dollar figure is calculated using the EPA's current reference price for regular gasoline, which is $3.99/gallon. EPA updates that reference periodically rather than tracking live pump prices, so treat it as a window-sticker estimate rather than today's pump number.

The table below scales the EPA's number to three common driving patterns. The combined MPG and the reference fuel price stay constant, only the annual mileage changes. To get a current-prices estimate, take your local gas price and multiply by 681.8 gallons (the car's annual consumption at the rated MPG).

Driving pattern Estimated annual fuel cost
Light driver, 7,500 miles per year $1,350
Average driver, 15,000 miles per year $2,700
Heavy driver, 25,000 miles per year $4,500

Year-over-year MPG for the Honda CR-V 2WD

The EPA has rated the Honda CR-V 2WD across 19 model years, from 1998 Honda CR-V 2WD through 2016 Honda CR-V 2WD. The numbers below are the best combined MPG figure the EPA published for each year, which lets you see when the car was at its most efficient and how recent generations stack up.

The 1998 Honda CR-V 2WD returned 21 MPG. The most recent 2016 Honda CR-V 2WD returns 29 MPG. That is an improvement of 8 MPG over 18 model years, the kind of gain that usually comes from smaller engines, hybrid systems, or aerodynamic redesigns.

Year Combined MPG Open year page
2016 29 MPG 2016 Honda CR-V 2WD
2015 29 MPG 2015 Honda CR-V 2WD
2014 26 MPG 2014 Honda CR-V 2WD
2013 26 MPG 2013 Honda CR-V 2WD
2012 26 MPG 2012 Honda CR-V 2WD
2011 24 MPG 2011 Honda CR-V 2WD
2010 24 MPG 2010 Honda CR-V 2WD
2009 23 MPG 2009 Honda CR-V 2WD
2008 23 MPG 2008 Honda CR-V 2WD
2007 23 MPG 2007 Honda CR-V 2WD
2006 23 MPG 2006 Honda CR-V 2WD
2005 23 MPG 2005 Honda CR-V 2WD
2004 22 MPG 2004 Honda CR-V 2WD
2003 22 MPG this page
2002 23 MPG 2002 Honda CR-V 2WD
2001 21 MPG 2001 Honda CR-V 2WD
2000 21 MPG 2000 Honda CR-V 2WD
1999 21 MPG 1999 Honda CR-V 2WD
1998 21 MPG 1998 Honda CR-V 2WD

Compare against other Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD for 2003

If you are cross-shopping the 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD, the most useful comparison is against the other cars in the Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD class for the same model year. The list below shows the highest-MPG peers, ranked from most to least efficient. Click any of them to open its full page.

The Toyota RAV4 EV leads this group at 78 MPG, 56 MPG ahead of the 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD.

Specifications

The 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD runs a 2.4-liter 4-cylinder engine paired with a automatic 4-spd, sending power through front-wheel drive.

Engine, transmission, and drivetrain together drive most of the variation in fuel economy across trims. A larger engine moves the car with less effort but burns more fuel. A turbo lets a small engine punch above its weight, often without much MPG penalty. All-wheel drive adds traction and weight, and usually costs a couple of MPG compared with two-wheel drive of the same engine.

Vehicle class
Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD
Engine
2.4L 4-cylinder
Transmission
Automatic 4-spd
Drivetrain
Front-Wheel Drive
Fuel type
Regular
Annual petroleum use
13.5 barrels per year

Common questions about the 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD

Quick answers to the questions people most often search for when looking up the 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD.

  • Is the 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD fuel efficient?
    Yes. The 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD returns 22 combined MPG, which beats the average car in the Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD class for the same model year by about 19%.
  • What MPG does the 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD get?
    The EPA rates the 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD at 22 combined MPG, 20 MPG in city driving, and 26 MPG on the highway. Real-world numbers depend on your driving style, the weather, and how loaded the car is.
  • How much does it cost to fuel a 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD per year?
    The EPA estimates an annual fuel cost of $2,700 for the 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD. That figure assumes 15,000 miles of driving per year, a 55% city and 45% highway split, and the EPA's published average fuel price for the rated fuel grade.
  • What fuel does the 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD use?
    The EPA lists the 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD as running on regular gasoline. Using a different grade than the manufacturer specifies can affect fuel economy and engine longevity.
  • Has the Honda CR-V 2WD become more fuel efficient over time?
    Yes. The first EPA-rated Honda CR-V 2WD, the 1998 Honda CR-V 2WD, returned 21 combined MPG. The most recent 2016 Honda CR-V 2WD returns 29 MPG, an improvement of 8 MPG over the run.
  • How much CO₂ does the 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD emit?
    Tailpipe CO₂ emissions are 404 g/mi. Multiplied across a typical year of driving (15,000 miles) that works out to about 6,059 kilograms of CO₂.
  • What is the difference between the city and highway MPG of the 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD?
    City driving returns 20 MPG and highway driving returns 26 MPG, a gap of 6 MPG. A spread that wide is typical of cars with conventional automatic or manual transmissions, where stop-start city traffic eats more fuel than a steady highway cruise.
  • What engine is in the 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD?
    The 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD has a 2.4-liter 4-cylinder engine.
  • What transmission and drivetrain does the 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD have?
    The 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD comes with a automatic 4-spd transmission and front-wheel drive.
  • How does the 2003 Honda CR-V 2WD compare to the best car in its class?
    The most efficient car in the Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD class for the 2003 model year is the Toyota RAV4 EV at 78 combined MPG. The Honda CR-V 2WD returns 22 MPG, a gap of 56 MPG. If you are comparing on fuel economy alone, the class leader is worth a look.

Source: U.S. EPA fuel economy dataset. Annual fuel cost figures assume 15,000 miles of driving per year and a 55% city, 45% highway split. Real-world mileage varies with driving conditions, vehicle maintenance, fuel quality, and driver behaviour.