This page collects every fuel-economy figure the EPA publishes for the 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon. Below you will find the headline combined, city, and highway MPG, the estimated annual fuel cost at three different driving levels, the tailpipe CO₂ emissions, and a full breakdown of the engine and drivetrain. If you want to know whether this generation got more or less efficient over the years, the year-over-year table further down covers every model year the EPA has rated.

Key takeaways

  • The most efficient car in the Special Purpose Vehicles class for the 1995 model year is the Suzuki Samurai at 25 MPG.
  • EPA estimates this car costs around $5,750 more in fuel over five years than an average new vehicle of the same model year.

Fuel economy at a glance

These are the EPA's official ratings for the 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon. The numbers come from a standardised laboratory test cycle and are the same figures that appear on the window sticker of every new car. Real-world mileage varies with driving style, weather, fuel quality, and how heavily loaded the car is.

Combined MPG is a 55/45 weighted blend of the city and highway test cycles. The EPA uses it as the single number you can compare across the entire dataset, including hybrids and EVs (which use the equivalent MPGe figure).

Combined MPG 18 MPG
City MPG 15 MPG
Highway MPG 23 MPG
Annual fuel cost $3,300
Tailpipe CO₂ 494 g/mi
Fuel type Regular

How the 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon compares

The 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon returns 18 combined MPG. Cars in the Special Purpose Vehicles class for the same model year average 15.9 MPG, which puts this car ahead of the class average by about 13%.

The most efficient car in the Special Purpose Vehicles class for the 1995 model year is the Suzuki Samurai at 25 MPG. The bar chart below puts the Buick Coachbuilder Wagon alongside the class best and the class average so you can see the full picture.

For broader context, the average new car of the 1995 model year (across all classes) returns 18.3 MPG. Larger vehicles pull the all-cars average down, so do not use that figure on its own to judge a small car or a hybrid. The full list of the most efficient cars of the 1995 model year is on its own page.

1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon
18 MPG
Class average, 1995
15.9 MPG
Class best, 1995
25 MPG
Average new car, 1995
18.3 MPG

Annual fuel cost across driving patterns

The headline annual fuel cost the EPA publishes assumes 15,000 miles of driving per year and a fuel mix of 55% city and 45% highway. The dollar figure is calculated using the EPA's current reference price for regular gasoline, which is $3.99/gallon. EPA updates that reference periodically rather than tracking live pump prices, so treat it as a window-sticker estimate rather than today's pump number.

The table below scales the EPA's number to three common driving patterns. The combined MPG and the reference fuel price stay constant, only the annual mileage changes. To get a current-prices estimate, take your local gas price and multiply by 833.3 gallons (the car's annual consumption at the rated MPG).

Driving pattern Estimated annual fuel cost
Light driver, 7,500 miles per year $1,650
Average driver, 15,000 miles per year $3,300
Heavy driver, 25,000 miles per year $5,500

Year-over-year MPG for the Buick Coachbuilder Wagon

The EPA has rated the Buick Coachbuilder Wagon across 6 model years, from 1990 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon through 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon. The numbers below are the best combined MPG figure the EPA published for each year, which lets you see when the car was at its most efficient and how recent generations stack up.

Combined MPG has stayed in roughly the same range across the run, hovering close to 18 MPG.

Year Combined MPG Open year page
1995 18 MPG this page
1994 18 MPG 1994 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon
1993 17 MPG 1993 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon
1992 18 MPG 1992 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon
1991 17 MPG 1991 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon
1990 18 MPG 1990 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon

Compare against other Special Purpose Vehicles for 1995

If you are cross-shopping the 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon, the most useful comparison is against the other cars in the Special Purpose Vehicles class for the same model year. The list below shows the highest-MPG peers, ranked from most to least efficient. Click any of them to open its full page.

The Suzuki Samurai leads this group at 25 MPG, 7 MPG ahead of the 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon.

Specifications

The 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon runs a 5.7-liter 8-cylinder engine paired with a automatic 4-spd, sending power through rear-wheel drive.

Engine, transmission, and drivetrain together drive most of the variation in fuel economy across trims. A larger engine moves the car with less effort but burns more fuel. A turbo lets a small engine punch above its weight, often without much MPG penalty. All-wheel drive adds traction and weight, and usually costs a couple of MPG compared with two-wheel drive of the same engine.

Vehicle class
Special Purpose Vehicles
Engine
5.7L 8-cylinder
Transmission
Automatic 4-spd
Drivetrain
Rear-Wheel Drive
Fuel type
Regular
Annual petroleum use
16.5 barrels per year

Common questions about the 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon

Quick answers to the questions people most often search for when looking up the 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon.

  • Is the 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon fuel efficient?
    Yes. The 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon returns 18 combined MPG, which beats the average car in the Special Purpose Vehicles class for the same model year by about 13%.
  • What MPG does the 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon get?
    The EPA rates the 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon at 18 combined MPG, 15 MPG in city driving, and 23 MPG on the highway. Real-world numbers depend on your driving style, the weather, and how loaded the car is.
  • How much does it cost to fuel a 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon per year?
    The EPA estimates an annual fuel cost of $3,300 for the 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon. That figure assumes 15,000 miles of driving per year, a 55% city and 45% highway split, and the EPA's published average fuel price for the rated fuel grade.
  • What fuel does the 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon use?
    The EPA lists the 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon as running on regular gasoline. Using a different grade than the manufacturer specifies can affect fuel economy and engine longevity.
  • Has the Buick Coachbuilder Wagon become more fuel efficient over time?
    Combined MPG has stayed close to flat across the run. Both the earliest (1990 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon, 18 MPG) and most recent (1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon, 18 MPG) versions sit in the same range.
  • How much CO₂ does the 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon emit?
    Tailpipe CO₂ emissions are 494 g/mi. Multiplied across a typical year of driving (15,000 miles) that works out to about 7,406 kilograms of CO₂.
  • What is the difference between the city and highway MPG of the 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon?
    City driving returns 15 MPG and highway driving returns 23 MPG, a gap of 8 MPG. A spread that wide is typical of cars with conventional automatic or manual transmissions, where stop-start city traffic eats more fuel than a steady highway cruise.
  • What engine is in the 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon?
    The 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon has a 5.7-liter 8-cylinder engine (EPA description: (350 V8) (FFS) (MPFI)).
  • What transmission and drivetrain does the 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon have?
    The 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon comes with a automatic 4-spd transmission and rear-wheel drive.
  • How does the 1995 Buick Coachbuilder Wagon compare to the best car in its class?
    The most efficient car in the Special Purpose Vehicles class for the 1995 model year is the Suzuki Samurai at 25 combined MPG. The Buick Coachbuilder Wagon returns 18 MPG, a gap of 7 MPG. If you are comparing on fuel economy alone, the class leader is worth a look.

Source: U.S. EPA fuel economy dataset. Annual fuel cost figures assume 15,000 miles of driving per year and a 55% city, 45% highway split. Real-world mileage varies with driving conditions, vehicle maintenance, fuel quality, and driver behaviour.