2013 BYD e6: MPG and fuel economy
The 2013 BYD e6 is a fully electric vehicle rated at 63 MPGe combined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. It has an EPA-rated driving range of 127 miles on a full charge.
This page collects every fuel-economy figure the EPA publishes for the 2013 BYD e6. Below you will find the headline combined, city, and highway MPG, the estimated annual fuel cost at three different driving levels, the tailpipe CO₂ emissions, and a full breakdown of the engine and drivetrain. If you want to know whether this generation got more or less efficient over the years, the year-over-year table further down covers every model year the EPA has rated.
Key takeaways
- Returns 152% better combined MPG than the average car in the Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD class for the 2013 model year (25 MPG class average).
- The most efficient car in the Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD class for the 2013 model year is the Toyota RAV4 EV at 76 MPG.
- The BYD e6 has gained 10 MPG since its first rated model year, the 2012 BYD e6 at 62 MPG.
- EPA estimates this car saves around $4,750 in fuel over five years compared with an average new vehicle of the same model year.
- Has an EPA-rated electric driving range of only 127 miles, which limits its usefulness for longer trips.
Fuel economy at a glance
These are the EPA's official ratings for the 2013 BYD e6. The numbers come from a standardised laboratory test cycle and are the same figures that appear on the window sticker of every new car. Real-world mileage varies with driving style, weather, fuel quality, and how heavily loaded the car is.
Combined MPG is a 55/45 weighted blend of the city and highway test cycles. The EPA uses it as the single number you can compare across the entire dataset, including hybrids and EVs (which use the equivalent MPGe figure).
| Combined MPG | 63 MPG |
| City MPG | 61 MPG |
| Highway MPG | 65 MPG |
| Annual fuel cost | $1,200 |
| Tailpipe CO₂ | — |
| Fuel type | Electricity |
How the 2013 BYD e6 compares
The 2013 BYD e6 returns 63 combined MPG. Cars in the Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD class for the same model year average 25 MPG, which puts this car ahead of the class average by about 152%.
The most efficient car in the Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD class for the 2013 model year is the Toyota RAV4 EV at 76 MPG. The bar chart below puts the BYD e6 alongside the class best and the class average so you can see the full picture.
For broader context, the average new car of the 2013 model year (across all classes) returns 23.4 MPG. Larger vehicles pull the all-cars average down, so do not use that figure on its own to judge a small car or a hybrid. The full list of the most efficient cars of the 2013 model year is on its own page.
Annual fuel cost across driving patterns
The headline annual fuel cost the EPA publishes assumes 15,000 miles of driving per year and a fuel mix of 55% city and 45% highway. The dollar figure is calculated using the EPA's current reference price for electricity, which is $0.15/kilowatt-hour. EPA updates that reference periodically rather than tracking live pump prices, so treat it as a window-sticker estimate rather than today's pump number.
The table below scales the EPA's number to three common driving patterns. The combined MPGe and the reference electricity price stay constant, only the annual mileage changes. Charging at home rather than at a public DC fast charger usually lowers the real cost below the EPA's published figure.
| Driving pattern | Estimated annual fuel cost |
|---|---|
| Light driver, 7,500 miles per year | $600 |
| Average driver, 15,000 miles per year | $1,200 |
| Heavy driver, 25,000 miles per year | $2,000 |
Year-over-year MPG for the BYD e6
The EPA has rated the BYD e6 across 7 model years, from 2012 BYD e6 through 2020 BYD e6. The numbers below are the best combined MPG figure the EPA published for each year, which lets you see when the car was at its most efficient and how recent generations stack up.
The 2012 BYD e6 returned 62 MPG. The most recent 2020 BYD e6 returns 72 MPG. That is an improvement of 10 MPG over 8 model years, the kind of gain that usually comes from smaller engines, hybrid systems, or aerodynamic redesigns.
| Year | Combined MPG | Open year page |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 72 MPG | 2020 BYD e6 |
| 2018 | 72 MPG | 2018 BYD e6 |
| 2017 | 72 MPG | 2017 BYD e6 |
| 2016 | 72 MPG | 2016 BYD e6 |
| 2014 | 63 MPG | 2014 BYD e6 |
| 2013 | 63 MPG | this page |
| 2012 | 62 MPG | 2012 BYD e6 |
Compare against other Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD for 2013
If you are cross-shopping the 2013 BYD e6, the most useful comparison is against the other cars in the Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD class for the same model year. The list below shows the highest-MPG peers, ranked from most to least efficient. Click any of them to open its full page.
The Toyota RAV4 EV leads this group at 76 MPG, 13 MPG ahead of the 2013 BYD e6.
Specifications
The 2013 BYD e6 is a fully electric vehicle. It is powered by 75 kw ac pmsm. The EPA rates its driving range at 127 miles.
Engine, transmission, and drivetrain together drive most of the variation in fuel economy across trims. A larger engine moves the car with less effort but burns more fuel. A turbo lets a small engine punch above its weight, often without much MPG penalty. All-wheel drive adds traction and weight, and usually costs a couple of MPG compared with two-wheel drive of the same engine.
- Vehicle class
- Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
- Transmission
- Automatic (A1)
- Drivetrain
- Front-Wheel Drive
- Fuel type
- Electricity
- Electric motor
- 75 kW AC PMSM
- EV range
- 127 miles
- Annual petroleum use
- 0.1 barrels per year
Common questions about the 2013 BYD e6
Quick answers to the questions people most often search for when looking up the 2013 BYD e6.
-
Is the 2013 BYD e6 fuel efficient?
Yes. The 2013 BYD e6 returns 63 combined MPG, which beats the average car in the Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD class for the same model year by about 152%. -
What MPG does the 2013 BYD e6 get?
The EPA rates the 2013 BYD e6 at 63 combined MPG, 61 MPG in city driving, and 65 MPG on the highway. Real-world numbers depend on your driving style, the weather, and how loaded the car is. -
How much does it cost to fuel a 2013 BYD e6 per year?
The EPA estimates an annual fuel cost of $1,200 for the 2013 BYD e6. That figure assumes 15,000 miles of driving per year, a 55% city and 45% highway split, and the EPA's published average fuel price for the rated fuel grade. -
Does the 2013 BYD e6 use gasoline?
No. The 2013 BYD e6 is fully electric and runs on grid electricity. The MPGe figure on this page converts electricity use into a gasoline-equivalent so you can compare it directly to a regular car. -
Has the BYD e6 become more fuel efficient over time?
Yes. The first EPA-rated BYD e6, the 2012 BYD e6, returned 62 combined MPG. The most recent 2020 BYD e6 returns 72 MPG, an improvement of 10 MPG over the run. -
How much CO₂ does the 2013 BYD e6 emit?
The 2013 BYD e6 produces zero tailpipe emissions because it runs entirely on electricity. The full carbon footprint of charging it depends on how the electricity on your local grid is generated, which varies a lot from one state to another. -
What is the difference between the city and highway MPG of the 2013 BYD e6?
City driving returns 61 MPG and highway driving returns 65 MPG, a gap of 4 MPG. The two figures are close enough that the car will hold its rated efficiency well across most driving patterns. -
What motor does the 2013 BYD e6 use?
The 2013 BYD e6 uses 75 kW AC PMSM. Electric motors do not have a displacement or cylinder count the way a combustion engine does, so EPA reporting focuses on the motor type and battery system instead. -
What transmission and drivetrain does the 2013 BYD e6 have?
The 2013 BYD e6 comes with a automatic (a1) transmission and front-wheel drive. -
How does the 2013 BYD e6 compare to the best car in its class?
The most efficient car in the Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD class for the 2013 model year is the Toyota RAV4 EV at 76 combined MPG. The BYD e6 returns 63 MPG, a gap of 13 MPG. If you are comparing on fuel economy alone, the class leader is worth a look.
Source: U.S. EPA fuel economy dataset. Annual fuel cost figures assume 15,000 miles of driving per year and a 55% city, 45% highway split. Real-world mileage varies with driving conditions, vehicle maintenance, fuel quality, and driver behaviour.